The true terrorists are the very same people who claim to fight terrorism

While the truth and nothing but the truth should interest us, many people are misled by their (legitimate) hatred of thugs and are duped by the mainstream media. They focus exclusively on what the (mendacious) media highlights.

11 September 2001, the Merah case, the Charlie Hebdo attacks, the Bataclan shooting on the 13 November, the Nice massacre on 14 July, a priest murdered at Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray on 26 July… Let’s take these targets one by one: the Twin Towers (symbol of capitalism), an anti-religious satirical magazine (anti-Muslim but, mostly, anti-Christian), a rock concert with satanic overtones, the day of national celebrations to commemorate the French republic and, finally, a priest, a minister of God. All these targets constitute symbols and were by no means chosen at random.

The media version of each terrorist attack is flawed, tainted by lies. The media routinely buries photographic evidence and statements which contradict their theory (for example: this woman who saw an armed man get out of the lorry: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0KCluRZWKs) or they interview a fake hero, such as the man from Nice, Franck, whose statement was entirely false (https://www.facebook.com/panhamza/photos/a.259863080821062.1073741827.258337060973664/691396847667681/?type=3&theater.)

From inside-job to chaos

In each case, not only are we unsure of the identity of the terrorist, but we never move up the chain of command in order to identify the brains behind the attacks. After all, this is really what should interest us if we want to eradicate the problem at its source. Who are the sponsors of terrorism? Who has the power and the network necessary to carry out these large-scale attacks without being caught or convicted?

According to Aymeric Chauprade : “Terrorism is essentially the consequence of state action,  the work of intelligence services which use lunatics and fanatics in order to carry out their operations.” To carry out their dirty work, so to speak. Working on this assumption, it is clear that the French state and its intelligence services (1) acted as accessories to the terrorists in these attacks. And it is highly likely that each case was an “inside-job”. We are currently experiencing the French equivalent of the 11th September 2001. The true terrorists are those who claim to fight terrorism. Obeying the orders of a foreign nation, these people are incapable of protecting the French people and are akin to pyromaniac fireman.

From September 11 2001 to this very day – for we are experiencing the continuation of 9/11 (2) – the message conveyed by the mainstream media is clear: “Radical Islam” has declared war against the “Christian” West. The plot is very simple: it has to be, so that the entire population, anesthetised by the cathode ray tube, can understand it.

If we are to believe the various comments in the main-stream media and on the internet, the enemy, the number one danger, is Islam, which seeks to conquer and destroy. It would appear, therefore, that there is no conspiracy.  This enemy acts quite openly and defies the Christian West which, incidentally, has largely abandoned the Christian faith. Therefore it is ISIL which, for 18 months now, has been terrorising the French population and claiming responsibility for each of the attacks.

Some simple questions: What is ISIL ? Who are the members of ISIL ? What is their aim? Who controls ISIL? Who stands to gain from these serial killings for which ISIL claims responsibility?

To all these questions we have neither precise answers nor conclusive evidence.  And we know just as little about ISIL as we do about recent events. Apparently, the terrorists were all Arab Muslims, followers of Wahhabi ideology. They claim that some were criminals with links to the intelligence services, while others were said to be mentally-disturbed alcoholics or Islamic extremists. Evidently, they were all mere sub-contractors, manipulated and used by the state (3). The very same state which claims to fight terrorism and Islamic extremism, even though for decades it has encouraged the massive inflow of immigrants, most of whom are … Muslims.  Spot the mistake.

If the French state really wanted to fight against Islamic terrorism, it would tackle the problem differently. It wouldn’t encourage immigration from North Africa and the Islamisation of France. It wouldn’t allow the construction of mosques. Its rhetoric and its spin are contradicted by the facts, so this government has no credibility.

Let’s come back to ISIL. According to the criminologist, Xavier Raufer, ISIL “is not a terrorist group” but “a mercenary army”. Answerable to whom? “There is not a single Islamic extremist among the leaders of ISIL”. According to him, ISIL is a secular group controlled from abroad. And it is the foreign element which we find most interesting. ISIL is, objectively speaking, primarily a weapon of destruction in the hands of the international Judeo-Masonry, working for the construction of Greater Israel. Anybody can see that ISIL, Al-Qaida (“CIA Arab legion”, according to W Tarpley) and the Al-Nusra Front (Al Qaida in Syria) are shadowy and amorphous groups which have never attacked Israel. This is perhaps just a coincidence … or perhaps not. After all, which state aims to destroy all the other nations in order secure its domination of the world? Which military power seeks to turn the world into battlefield? Motivated by hatred and vengeance, it pursues its messianic mission. Who would look to turn the Christian West against the Islamic world in order to plunge France into chaos and then do same everywhere else in the world? Once we have examined the world revolutionary movement, that is to say the Talmudic-Masonic conspiracy, asking these questions leads us directly to the answers.

Create a Climate of Fear

Clearly, the objective of this operation, this series of terrorist attacks, is to establish a climate of fear in France. Fear had already set in with the Charlie Hebdo attack. You only have to listen to people in the street talking about how they are scared of going out. This fear, which is building to a crescendo, eerily resembles that of 1793 when the Freemasons Robespierre (his real surname: Rubinstein), Danton, Marat and Duport (the mastermind behind the massacres) were at work. This climate of fear aims to make people accept unpopular government decisions which go against public interest (reform of employment law). This climate of fear, therefore, seeks to impose a Masonic dictatorship (4). It also aims, above all, to trigger a civil war in France.

This is what the French secret service chief, Patrick Calvar, told us last month:

“We are on the verge of a civil war. I think this conflict (desired by the extreme-right in particular) will take place. A couple more terrorist attacks and it will happen.”

In conclusion, we have every reason to fear a civil war between the Christian and Muslim communities or that foreign mercenaries ransack the country as they did in Syria and Libya (in fact, just about anywhere in the world where the American-European-Zionist axis has imposed “democracy and freedom”.) Faced with this situation, what should we do? Most importantly, we should not get involved in a conflict from which we have nothing to gain and everything to lose, for the die has been cast. While waiting to discover the truth about these terrorist attacks we must, more than ever, remain level-headed and we should not heed the media siren calls luring us into a civil war. Remain vigilant and, if you are a Christian, find time for prayer.


(1) According to Roland Dumas, former French foreign affairs minister, the French intelligence services are controlled by Mossad:

https://lacontrerevolution.wordpress.com/2015/12/10/israel-controle-les-services-de-renseignements-francais/

(2)  According to the Kabbalists, the number 911 denotes the eviction of God.

(3) Mind control techniques can be used in this case.

https://lacontrerevolution.wordpress.com/2016/06/11/sortie-du-livre-mk-abus-rituels-et-controle-mental-dalexandre-lebreton/

(4) The Masonic dictatorship, which is the true face of democracy.


Article Translated from French

The original author was Johan Livernette

Source: https://johanlivernette.wordpress.com/2016/07/28/les-veritables-terroristes-sont-ceux-qui-pretendent-le-combattre/#more-3251

Zionism and the Clash of Civilisations

Interview with Youssef Hindi, author of  “The West and Islam”, an extraordinary work on the origins of Zionism and the nebulous neo-conservative theory of the so-called “clash of civilisations”

Using reliable sources to support his arguments, Youssef Hindi, a Frano-Morrocan historian, traces the roots of Zionism back to the messianic projects developed during the 13th century by rabbis and Kabbalists.


Aux origines moyenâgeuses et fumeuses du sionisme

In your book, you advance a new theory regarding Zionism. Could you briefly explain it to us?

The main theory of my book is as follows. Contrary to popular belief, Zionism is not an atheist ideology; nor was it created by the English Puritan movement during the 17th century as certain historians, such as Shlomo Sand, believe.

Zionism was from the very beginning a messianic project, created by rabbis during the Middle Ages. This project was developed and consolidated throughout the centuries to the point where it took on an atheist form, in a similar fashion to a number of modern ideologies dating from the 19th century.

This is not the only argument I put forward in this book. This messianic ideology which gave rise to Zionism also led to the strategy of the “clash of civilisations” and the creation of the myth of Judeo-Christianity, which dates from the early 16th century.

That these projects were born during the Middle Ages is one thing. But how do you explain the fact that they have managed to survive over the centuries? What’s more, how did these religious ideas come to take on an atheist appearance? Is this not a contradiction in terms?

Throughout the book, I illustrate the following key point which is not immediately obvious when one reads the book for the first time: the fact that ideas in history are updated. History is driven and animated by ideologies and ideas which are created, transformed and then spread. These ideas are born in people’s minds; they then guide people as well as the groups to which they belong: history is made by the groups led by these ideas.

Moreover, I construct my arguments very carefully, step by step, using a range of reliable sources. I highlight the coherence of the project, over seven centuries old, by carefully showing the links between the series of important, and often unknown, events which decisively changed the course of history.

Jewish messianism went through a period of transition between the end of the 17th century and the 18th century with the Sabbatean-Frankist movement. This messianic movement, which was both apocalyptic and antinomic (opposing God and natural law), was created by the false messiahs Sabbataï Tsevi (falsely converted to Islam) and Jacob Frank (falsely converted to Catholicism). It led the way to an atheist form of messianism which then gave a non-religious appearance to the vast messianic project. It was from this movement that the utopian libertarian and socialist revolutions of 19th and 20th centuries were born. During the same period, Zionism in its non-religious form appeared in Central Europe, which is exactly where the atheist revolutionary movements multiplied.

So what about the “clash of civilisations” theory ? You say that it is linked to messianism and Zionism. By attempting to link everything to this messianism, are you not speculating?

The “clash of civilisations” is by no means a theory: it is a strategy. My research shows that Solomon Molcho, who was a Kabbalist, developed this strategy in accordance with the rabbinic and eschatological interpretations of the Bible. During the 16th century, he attempted to push first the Catholic Church and then the Holy Roman Empire into a war against the Ottoman Empire, the idea being to drive out the Turks from Palestine, thereby allowing the reconstruction the Kingdom of Israel.

This is precisely what the British did at the end of the First World War. They dismantled the Ottoman Empire and created the Jewish homeland in Palestine (1919-20) following the promise they had made to the Zionists in the Balfour Declaration (1917).

Molcho’s project took four centuries to come to fruition, but it was finally accomplished. This is one of form evidence that I use as a means of showing the durability of the Zionist project and the intrinsic link that exists between Zionism and the “clash of civilisations” strategy, the latter being a prerequisite to the achievement of the Zionist project (see article on the Oded Yinon plan https://geostrategieblog.wordpress.com/youssef-hindi-war-in-yemen/).

In 1957, Bernard Lewis*, who influenced Samuel Huntington†, removed the religious element from this messianic strategy by giving it a scientific appearance, in order to set it up as theory. As a worthy heir to Molcho, Lewis decrees that the (post) Christian world and the Islamic world are, by their very nature, destined to confront each other in a war. It was Bernard Lewis who, from the year 2000 onwards, strove to convince Vice-President Dick Cheney that the US should invade Iraq.

This “clash of civilisations”, conjured up from nowhere, basically conceals what I term “a global ideological conflict” between the Old Testament world (covering the Anglo-Saxon thalassocracy, its former Catholic vassals on the European continent, the Wahhabi oil monarchies and Israel) and the rest of the world.

* Bernard Lewis is a Jewish historian who holds British, American and Israeli passports.
† Samuel Huntington, author of “The Clash of Cvilisations and Remaking of World Order”

Article Translated from French

Youssef Hindi was interviewed by Gilles Munier, author of the “Black Gold Spies” (see https://geostrategieblog.wordpress.com/2016/03/07/spies-of-the-black-gold/).

Occident et Islam“, is published by Editions Sigest, http://editions.sigest.net/

Source: France-Irak Actualité

http://www.france-irak-actualite.com/2015/10/aux-origines-moyenageuses-et-fumeuses-du-sionisme.html


See also: Youssef Hindi discusses his book with Jean-Michel Vernochet (we have provided English subtitles).