Who’s really behind the terrorist attacks?

By Philippe Ploncard d’Assac

Source: Cercles Nationalistes Français

http://nationalisme-francais.com/communique-du-19-aout-2017-des-cercles-nationalistes-francais.html


The recent terrorist attacks in Barcelona, Cambrils and in Finland, following those in other European cities, draw attention to the strange inability of European governments to prevent these attacks. They are, however, connected via the European Union and are supposed to cooperate with one another. And yet, each time, their security services prove to be incapable of preventing these attacks, even though many of the perpetrators are, as they say, “well-known to the police.” So why then are they able to prevent these attacks against political leaders but not against ordinary citizens?

First of all, a few observations:

  1. How come the criminals are shot dead virtually every time ? And yet, it would be better to investigate the terrorist network to find out who gave the orders for these attacks. Not only has this not been done but it seems the authorities do not wish to do so…
  2. How come the alleged perpetrator of the Barcelona attack, Driss Oukabir (nicknamed “Soprano”), an Islamist “on the run” who frequently went to nightclubs with women, was not found…?
  3. How come, according to the Spanish police, he was only identified because he had obligingly left his passport in the van used for the attack…? These terrorists really do have the peculiar habit of leaving their pieces of identification for the investigators…!
  4. How come the “alleged perpetrators” of the Cambrils attack were killed, whereas we were told they wearing “fake explosive belts”…?! Odd terrorists or an odd set-up, as if they had been made to play a role, without telling them why. It is strange that the “alleged” terrorists, according to the Spanish police, were killed without due process…?!
  5. Just as US Admiral John Pointdexter, a freemason, brought in the Patriot Act following 9/11, all European governments are now taking advantage of the emotional shock sparked by these attacks to impose repressive laws which do nothing to improve the security of citizens. Indeed, we would be tempted to say the effect is just the opposite. In this respect, the recent attacks in Spain and in Finland will allow Macron to finally pass his controversial security law (which, though it would bring an end to the fallacious state of emergency, will still include its temporary measures). Thus we are gradually becoming a repressive police state, a dictatorship disguised by a security pretext […]
  6. How can we really fight against so-called “Islamic” terrorism while, like all European states, we continue to open the door to immigrants, as if following orders? And yet, the photos of the hordes of “immigrants” show that they are almost entirely all men, whose sexual outbursts in the form of rape are well known by the countries which welcome them.

It follows, then, that if European government really wanted to fight this “Islamic terrorism”, they would begin by closing the borders and would make the perpetrators talk instead of killing them, which wipes out all possibility of identifying who really gave the orders. Meanwhile, it’s only Zionism which ultimately benefits from these attacks.

So, before repeating “it’s Islamic terrorism, it’s ISIL”  like our governments and our media under orders, we ought to really remember that ISIL was created by the CIA and Israel in order to destabilise the Middle East and destroy the countries in the region which obstruct plans for “Greater Israel”, which explains the wars in Iraq and Syria.

We should also recall that ISIL is led by a certain al-Baghdadi, whose real name is Samuel Eliot, a former Mossad agent, as revealed by Edward Snowden, former member of the CIA and the NSA.

So “who benefits from the crime”, from these crimes ?!

We are in the midst of a manipulation by politicians and the media.

So is it Islamic terrorism or Zionist terrorism under a “false flag” ?!

This is the question we should ask if we want finally wipe out this terrorism, which has come from elsewhere…!


Translated from French

 

Advertisements

The creators of ISIS

By Jean Terrien

Source: Rivarol n°3291, 13/7/2017

[…]

ISIS was born in precisely the country which was the first target in the series of wars designed to break up the Arab world: Iraq. The “Arab Spring” of 2010-11 was used to spread terrorism across the Arab-Muslim world. This was the period during which the Sarkozy government dispatched agents from the DGSE to manage mercenaries financed by Qatar, coordinating air strikes with gains on the ground made by the false rebels (but true terrorists), supposedly fighting for freedom, against tyranny, etc. The Hollande government continued along exactly the same lines by arming Syrian terrorist groups, such as the Free Syrian Army (an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood) which launched its offensive against the Syrian government in 2011.

Laurent Fabius, far from retracting the statement he made on December 2012 regarding the Al-Nusra Front (nothing other than Al-Qaida) which, according to him, was “doing good work”, he persisted and announced in a Tweet (August 2014) that high-performance weapons were soon to be delivered to the rebels in Syria. So it wasn’t surprising to then see photos of ISIS members carrying the Famas, a French assault rifle.

IMG_2526.JPG

Indeed, contrary to what one might think, there is no boundary or any true opposition between the dozens of terrorist groups active in Syria and Iraq. When ISIS were not supplied directly, the “moderate” terrorists of the Free Syrian Army would supply ISIS (mainly via their ally the Al-Nusra Front) with weapons they received from the Western powers.

The Creators of ISIS

On 28 September 2013, the New York Times published a new Middle Eastern map, entitled “How 5 countries could become 14”. On this map, published four months before the emergence of ISIS as a state in a territorial sense, we see a country named “Sunnistan”, located between Syria and Iraq: precisely the territory which came to be conquered by ISIS and defined the Islamic State’s borders. We must, therefore, ask whether the Americans are psychic or merely the creators of ISIS, especially since general Wesley Clark, former NATO forces chief, declared on CNN that ISIS had been “created by our friends and allies to defeat Hezbollah.” These friends and allies are no other than the Israelis…

On 2 March 2007, general Wesley Clark declared that at the Pentagon, just weeks after 9/11, he was handed a report detailing how the American government planned to invade seven countries over a period of five years, starting with Iraq, followed by Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finally, Iran. Clark pointed out that at the time this project was classified top secret.

In September 2014, the former Cuban president, Fidel Castro, condemned American support for Israel, accusing senator John McCain of having participated in the creation of ISIS.

Leaving aside the American and Israeli sponsors, let’s look at the architects of this state organisation, which had “suddenly” emerged before the astounded eyes of the world in the first week of 2014, when the Russians had just stopped (September 2013) American plans to bomb Syria.

On 18 April 2015, the German news magazine Der Spiegel published a highly informative report on the origins and organisation of the terrorist state. The German investigative journalists brought back documents they had bought from a rebel group, which had found them in the house of the ISIS organiser. These documents prove that:

“An Iraqi officer planned Islamic State’s takeover in Syria.”

“And portray an organization that, while seemingly driven by religious fanaticism, is actually coldly calculating.”

This architect in the shadows was named Abd Muhammad al-Khlifawi (killed in Janaury 2014 during a battle with rebels), but went by the name of Haji Bakr. He was a former colonel in Saddam’s intelligence service.

The secret documents, handwritten by Haji Bakr, were part of a file which included organisational charts, lists and programmes outlining the means to gradually dominate a country.  Der Spiegel describes the documents as follows:

They reveal a multilayered composition and directives for action, some already tested and others newly devised for the anarchical situation in Syria’s rebel-held territories. In a sense, the documents are the source code of the most successful terrorist army in recent history.”

Indeed, what we have here is the very replica of the Ba’athist state, which was based on a socialist model with an omnipresent security apparatus (the generals themselves were under surveillance). Moreover, Haji Bakr was not the only ISIS chief to have been a high-ranking member of Saddam Hussein’s armed forces. One of the leaders was an intelligence officer in a secret service unit attached to the anti-aircraft division, while another was a senior officer in the Iraqi sercret services.

In 2010, this small group of former Ba’athist officers, all of whom were secular if not atheist, made Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi the emir and then the “Caliph” of the Islamic State. According to Der Spigel:

“They reasoned that Baghdadi, an educated cleric, would give the group a religious face.”

They add:

“ISIS has little in common with predecessors like Al-Qaida aside from its jihadist label. There is essentially nothing religious in its actions, its strategic planning, its unscrupulous changing of alliances and its precisely implemented propaganda narratives. Faith, even in its most extreme form, is just one of many means to an end. Islamic State’s only constant maxim is the expansion of power at any price.”

All these wonderful people – former officers from Saddam’s government, Al-Qaida terrorists – came into contact with each other in 2006 not only in Abu Grahib prison but also at Camp Bucca where, according to a number of accounts, ISIS was created under the approving gaze of American soldiers.

[…]


Translated from French

The Matrix of Terrorism

By Youssef Hindi

Source: http://www.geopolintel.fr/article1993.html


[…]

English, French and Russian Revolutions

A parallel can be drawn between the methods of political terror deployed in England by Cromwell during the 17th century, those deployed by the Wahhabi Saud tribe in the Arabian Peninsula during the 18th century and those of the French Revolution (1789), which foreshadowed the anarcho-socialist revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries. These revolutions, many of which were accompanied by territorial expansion, all have one point in common: ideological domination by means of mass extermination. The aim was to build modern institutions on the remains of traditional ones.

The modern era and its murderous revolutions began with Protestantism, an Old Testament religion which is inherently revolutionary.

In 1641, the “English Revolution” began. It was led by the Puritan, sectarian and fanatical Oliver Cromwell (1699-1658), who belonged to those who went by the name of “Old Testament Christians”. He banned the celebration of Christmas, burnt churches and murdered priests. This revolution ended in 1649 with the execution of King Charles I (just as, a century later, the French Revolution culminated with the execution of King Louis XVI). The modus operandi of the French revolutionaries was clearly identical to that of their English predecessors.

The French revolutionaries massacred some 260 000 Vendean Catholics, who fought against the anticlerical Revolution. Cromwell, who had set out to conquer Scotland and Ireland, had foreshadowed the French revolutionaries and their methods. La Terreur clearly came to serve as a model for the majority of terrorist extermination wars of the 20th century: the Armenian genocide, led by the Sabbatean Young Turks (the Donmëh), and the messianic Judeo-Bolshevik revolution. The Vendean genocide came to be used as reference for Lenin’s crushing of the Tambov peasant revolt by means of chemical weapons (June to December 1921). The death toll of this new Vendean massacre is estimated to be 240 000.

The Talmud and Frankism: the source of revolutionary anarchism ?

The origin of this modern nihilism, driving force of the 19th and 20th century socialist revolutions, is found in the Sabbatean-Frankist interpreation of  Kabblah and, going back further in history, is also found in the Talmud itself.

Following the antinomian Kabbalists Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) and Jacob Frank (1726-1791), both Kabbalah and messianism in its Sabbatean-Frankist form paved the way for atheist messianism (atheist in appearance, at any rate).

As the Jewish Marxist philosopher Michael Lowry explains very clearly, the structure of socialism is that of Jewish messianism.

Of all the movements within socialism, it was the anarchic movement (the historical manifestation of which was the Bolshevik Revolution) which remained the most faithful to the cataclysmic messianism of the Frankist interpretation of Kabbalah. Indeed, this Sabbatean-Frankist aspect of anarchism can be very clearly seen in the work of Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876). Indeed, one would think he was paraphrasing Jacob Frank when he wrote:

“The passion for destruction is also a creative passion”

“I believe in neither constitutions nor laws…it is something else we need: passion and life, a new world without laws and therefore free.” (1)

A century before Bakunin, Jacob Frank declared :

“I have come to Poland uniquely to eradicate all laws and all religions, and my desire is to bring life to the world.” (2)

The roots of this Frankist messianism are found in the Talmud and, specifically, in this Midrash (Talmudic commentary of the Bible):

“Israel asks God: when will you send us redemption? He replies: when you have descended to the lowest level, then I will bring redemption.”

This is the Talmudic prophecy which Jacob Frank attempted to fulfil by spreading depravity and general chaos. He thus declared:

“I have not come to elevate, I have come to destroy and lower all things until everything has sunk, that it can descend no more…There is no ascension without prior descent…” (3)

Catastrophe and widespread depravity is, in traditional Jewish eschatology, the prerequisite for the coming of the messianic age and redemption. As the leading expert of Kabblah and Jewish messianism Gershom Scholem explains, there are certain interpretations which give a new meaning to Psalm 146:7. As opposed to the traditional version, according to which during the messianic age “The Lord sets prisoners free”, we should read “The Lord removes prohibitions.” (4)

Following Jacob Frank, Bakunin echoes this perfectly.

It is not all surprising, therefore, to find Jewish messiansim in its Frankist form at the heart of socialist thought, once we know that it was precisely in Central Europe (where Frankism was born and took root) that socialist movements were formed.

As Michaël Lowy explains, for the majaority of socialist thinkers,

There were only two ways out (within the framework of neo-romanticism): either a return to one’s own historical roots, one’s own culture, nationality or ancestral religion; or adherence to a revolutionary utopia of a universal nature. Unsurprisingly a number of Jewish thinkers from the German culture, who were close to anti-capitalist romanticism, simultaneously chose both these paths through a rediscovery of the Jewish religion (in particular the restorative utopian  interpretation of messianism) and an affinity for or identification with the profoundly nostalgic utopias of the revolutionaries…This dual approach characterises several Central European Jewish thinkers who formed an extremely diverse group but who, nonetheless, were unified by this central problem. Among them we find the greatest mind of the 20th century…Franz Rosenzweig, Martin Buber, Gershom Scholem, Gustav Landauer, Walter Benjamin, Franz Kafka, Ernst Toller, Ernst Bloch, Georg Lukacs” (5)

Ernst Toller, Ernst Bloch and Georg Lukacs were, as Lowy highlights, “assimilated anarcho-Bolshevik Jews” as opposed to the others who had “abandoned their Jewish identity while keeping a vague connection with Judaism.”  This is not inherently contradictory, bearing in mind the close relationship between European Jewish assimilationism and Frankism (6). Lowy explains that “the references of their religious atheism (a term invented by Lukacs) are both Jewish and Christian” and their political evolution led them to a point where they faced the problem of reconciling the two (7).

Several contemporary accounts of Georg Lukacs reveal his fervent and apocalyptic messianism. Marianne Weber, his wife, described Lukacs as being an intellectual who was “stirred by eschatological hopes that a new messiah would come” and for whom “a socialist regime based on fraternity is the prerequisite for redemption.”

Lukacs himself terms this materialist form of messianim “atheist religiosity.” During a conference held in 1918, he paid homage to the Anabaptists (an evangelical Christian movement) and advocates their categorical imperative:  “Bring forth the Kingdom of God to this earth.” (8)

During the same period, that of the 1918-19 German Revolution, the German Jewish socialist Gustav Landauer was, like Lukacs, seized by messianic fervour and compared the “spirit of the Revolution” to the action of the “ancient prophets.” In the preface to the second edition of the Call to Socialism, he wrote:

“Chaos is here. Minds are awakening…May the revolution bring rebirth…May the revolution produce religion, a religion of action, life, love, that makes men happy, redeems them and overcomes impossible situations.” (9)

Revolutionary terror, deployed by Cromwell in England and by the revolutionaries in France, was the model for the Bolsheviks. It was also that of the Jewish homeland (1920) with the creation of the Yishuv terrorist organisations the Haganah and the Irgun (the foundation of the Israeli Defence Forces) whose role was to support colonial expansion in Palestine.

We shouldn’t forget the famous Nakam terrorist group. In 1945, Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, former chemist and leader of the World Zionist Organisation, supplied the Nakam Group* with chemical formulas to poison the water supply in Munich, Nuremberg and Hamburg. Abba Kovner was arrested on his return from Israel were he had obtained the poison, and his commando of mass murderers were stopped from executing their plan. In 1946, however, they succeeded in poisoning the bread for the prisoners held at Langwasser. Abba Kovener is today celebrated in Israel as a hero…

Terrorism on a national scale, however, is but one version of revolutionary terror. The International Brigades (Spain 1936-1938) ushered in the age of international terrorism. Wahhabi “jihadism” continues in this vein.

From Revolutionary Terror to Wahhabi Terrorism

The French Revolution of 1789 was, from the outset, a project to establish a “Universal Republic” (10) by violent means. Gustave Le Bon, anthropologist and sociologist, had understood this perfectly:

The violence of the Revolution, its massacres, its need for propaganda, its declarations of war against all kings can be explained only if we consider that it was the establishment of a new religious belief in the soul of the masses. (11)

Wahhabi terrorism, as is known, has been used by the US ever since the late 1970s (12). Zbigniew Brzezinski (1928-2017), who was national security adviser to president Carter at the time, supervised the coordination between the CIA and the Pakistani and Saudi intelligence services with the objective of financing future terrorists, including Bin Laden. The idea was to lure the Soviet Union into the Afghan graveyard. This strategy was again used in the late 1990s in Chechnya, in order to trigger the disintegration of the Russian Federation. It was then later deployed in Iraq, following the 2003 war. Since 2011, it has been applied to Libya, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere…

Indeed, in an interview with the Nouvel Observateur (15 January 1998), Brzezinski explained why and how he had financed Bin Laden in Afghanistan. In response to the question “Do you not regret having promoted Islamic fundamentalism, having given weapons and advice to future terrorists?” he answered:

What is most important for world history? The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet Empire? Some Islamic hotheads or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

And when the journalist remarked:

“Some hotheads?” But it has been said time and time again: today Islamic fundamentalism represents a world-wide threat…

Brzezinski replied:

Rubbish! It’s said that the West has a global policy regarding Islam. That’s hogwash: there is no global Islam. Let’s look at Islam in a rational and not a demagogic or emotional way. It is the first world religion with 1.5 billion adherents. But what is there in common between fundamentalist Saudi Arabia, moderate Morocco, militaristic Pakistan, pro-Western Egypt and secularized Central Asia? Nothing more than that which connects the Christian countries… (13)

What Brzezinski is explaining here is that Wahhabi terrorism is an artificial creation and that the extent to which it spreads across the globe depends on Western policy. And history testifies to this. Indeed, Saudi Arabia would not have been established without British support during and after the First World War. In 1945, Ibn Saud and Franklin Roosevelt made a pact aboard the USS Quincy: in exchange for Saudi oil, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia would from now on be protected by the Americans, who took this opportunity to drive out the British.

With the American dollar linked to Saudi oil, the Wahabbi doctrine, funded by petrodollars, expanded beyond Saudi Arabia. Wahhabism has since sought to conquer Islam via various institutions, such as the World Islamic Congress, the Islamic Congress of Jerusalem, Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, the Muslim World League, World Assembly of Muslim Youth.

The Saudi Wahhabists also finance university chairs at Harvard, California, Santa Barbara, London and Moscow. In addition, Saudi Arabia holds 30 per cent of the total Arab satellite budget, controls fifty TV channels and almost as many newspapers and magazines (14).

All this is done with the support of the Anglo-Saxon powers which lead the “free” world. This support was recently renewed by president Trump who, with his Riyadh speech and the very large arms contract which he signed with Saudi Arabia, has tacitly approved the continuation of Wahhabi military aggression in the Middle East.

* Known in English as “The Avengers”, from the Hebrew Nakam, meaning revenge, this group belonged to the Bricha movement, and was led by the Zionist Abba Kovner.

References:

[1] Quoted in Michaël Lowy, Messianisme juif et utopie libertaires en Europe centrale, Archives de sciences sociales des religions. N. 51/1, Persée, 1981, pp. 6-7.

[2] In Gershom Scholem, Aux origines religieuses du judaïsme laïque, de la mystique aux Lumières, Calmann-Levy, 2000, p. 212.

[3] Charles Novak, Jacob Frank, le faux messie, 2012, l’Harmattan, p. 56.

[4] Cité par Michaël Lowy, op. cit., p. 8.

[5] Michaël Lowy, op. cit., p. 11.

[6] See : Youssef Hindi, La mystique de la laïcité, chapter IV, 2017, Sigest.

[7] Michaël Lowy, op. cit., p. 12.

[8] Michaël Lowy, op. cit., p. 36.

[9] Michaël Lowy, op. cit., p. 22.

[10] See Anacharsis Cloots, La République universelle, 1792.

[11] Gustave Le Bon, Psychologie des foules, 1895, Presses Universitaires de France, 1981.

[12] Regarding Wahhabism, see : Jean-Michel Vernochet, Les Égarés, le wahhabisme est-il un contre islam ?, 2013, Sigest.

[14] See the list in Al-Farsy, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques : King Fahd ben Adbul Aziz, Chanel Islands : Knight Communication, 2001, pp. 220-228.

 

Israel supports Syrian Islamists

Why Israel supports Syrian Islamists

By Antoine de Lacoste

Source: http://www.medias-presse.info/pourquoi-israel-soutient-les-islamistes-syriens/78461/


Since the beginning of the war in Syria, Israel has been directly supporting several Syrian Islamist groups. Weapons, money and medical supplies have been supplied in large quantities to the jihadists, especially along the border in the Golan Heights.

For a while, there was a rumour, denied by Tel Aviv: wounded Islamists were cared for in Israeli hospitals. A serious incident finally confirmed this news: Islamists had committed atrocities in a Druze village, before retreating, chased out by Druze reinforcements.

This highly singular and very close-knit community lives mainly in a territory situated between Syria and Israel. All the men are armed and are formidable mountain warriors. The French army retains a bitter memory of this fact from the 1925 Druze Revolt.

When chasing the Islamists, the Druzes were shocked to see their enemies running towards the border, where Israeli ambulances were waiting to take away their injured. Things ended badly for the Islamists: the ambulances were intercepted and the wounded were executed by the Druzes. The Israeli army did not intervene so as not to alienate a population with which it maintains good relations.

This rumour being factually confirmed, we should examine the reasons for this support, paradoxical in appearance only. There are two reasons.

The first reason is the desire to see Bachar fall. The Assads are old enemies of Israel and the collapse of their regime would have been the culmination of a long-standing enmity. In addition, this would have trigerred chaos in this reviled country. Indeed, the Israeli policy mainly aims at destabilising hostile regimes in order to safeguard its security. Besides, this was one of Bush’s aims with the war in Iraq, a complete success as Iraq no longer exists. This wasn’t the goal of the Americans, who failed to grasp some of the finer points of the Middle East, but it was definitely that of the Israelis.

The next target will be Iran, as Donald Trump clearly indicated recently, in order to emphasise the continuation of the relationship between Washington and Tel Aviv.

But following Russia’s intervention, Israel knows that it has lost its gamble and that Assad’s regime isn’t about to topple anytime soon. So why continue?

For a very simple reason: the need to establish a buffer-zone in the Golan Heights in order to prevent the Syrian army from returning to its border. Almost the entire length of the border is, then, in the hands of the Islamists who, without Israeli support, would have been defeated a long time ago.

So as soon as the Syrian army attempts to launch an offensive, the Israeli air-force is quick to intervene to rescue their protégés, the pretext being a reaction to Syrian provocations.

Aside from the Syrians, it is also a way to keep Hezbollah at bay. Israel had to put up with Hezbollah on its border with Lebanon (its 2006 offensive broke against fierce Shia resistance) and it has no intention of now seeing them roam the Golan Heights.

Nevertheless, there’ll come a moment when the Islamists will be defeated in Syria, which will not tolerate a part of its territory being once again annexed by Israel via jihadists.

Russian diplomacy will be necessary.


Translated from French

 

Clash of Civilisations Strategy

Maintaining the domination of France by means of the Clash of Civilisations Strategy

By Youssef Hindi

Source: http://www.geopolintel.fr/article1989.html


[…]

Given a context in which geopolitical forces oppose the Euro-Atlanticist block, historically recognised as the product of Judeo-Protestantism and the Anglo-American alliance, it is vital for the agents of Zionism to prevent France from joining an alliance comprising Russia, the major Christian power, and Muslim countries together with Muslim organisations (Iran, Syria, Iraq, Hezbollah…). I have already explained on several occasions how American Zionism, via Henry Kissinger’s strategy, has attempted to separate Russia from its Middle Eastern allies (chiefly Iran) to the benefit of Israel. So far, Vladimir Putin has not fallen into this trap.

Confined purely to France, this strategy breaks down as follows:

Since the atheist and secular Republic is now deprived of Catholicism, in opposition to which it was constructed, it is currently using Islam as an opponent in order to regenerate itself. In the context of a French nationalist backlash, immigrants (the majority of whom are Muslim) are to play the role of those excluded* from the history of the Republic and the construction of modern French identity, in order to act as a shield for the Jewish community (whose leaders recall the events of the 1890s and 1930s). By maintaining the Republic, the idea is to include the Jews of France in a national alliance with the ancestral French. The identity of this alliance is defined in opposition to Muslims, excluded owing to the Republic’s secularism. Indeed, it would be a catastrophe for the Republic and the Zionist movement in France if the Catholics (traditionally opposed to Judaism and republicanism) and the Muslims (fundamentally opposed to Israel and Zionism) were to form an alliance.

Preventing the Republic from collapsing on those who have taken it hostage, this is the role of those who implement the “clash of civilisations” strategy in France.

[…]

*In the days of Catholic France, this role was chiefly played by Jews, Protestants and Freemasons.


Translated from French

 

 

From 9/11 to Arab Springs

How many world wars for Zion?

By Laurent Guyénot

Source: https://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Combien-de-guerres-mondiales-pour-Sion-39102.html


[…]

Today, there is evidence to demonstrate that the September 11 attacks were planned by Israel and its neoconservative moles, aided by New York’s super Sayanim, such as Larry Silverstein.

It has to be understood, however, that the success of such an operation depends on Israel’s ability to compel the entire American state apparatus to stick to the script, and this demands that it becomes deeply involved.

I hypothesized (26) that, within the political framework of the “Great Game”, members of the Pentagon and American intelligence were willing to participate in a “false flag” operation, entailing only minor damage to the Pentagon building. But they were duped by the Zionists who went much further with the destruction of the Twin Towers coupled with a perfectly managed operation to manipulate the media on an unprecedented scale.

America’s goal was to regain control of Afghanistan. As a result of Zbignew Brezinzki’s policy pursued during the 80s, the country had fallen into the hands of the Taliban regime, which was no longer yielding results for the US. This explains why Bin Laden was chosen as the scapegoat and why Brzezinski enthusiastically endorsed this first phase.

But this minor objective was of no interest to the Zionists, who didn’t hesitate to use any form of manipulation to incriminate Saddam Hussein. Following Afghanistan, they had, in the end, succeeded to force through the destruction of Iraq, using the pretext of an imaginary “weapons of mass destruction” stockpile, dreamt up by the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans, run by the neoconservatives William Luti, Abram Shulsky, Douglas Feith and Paul Wolfowitz.

Despite his initial misgivings, Secretary of State Colin Powell was persuaded to call for war before the UN General Assembly on 5 February 2003. “A permanent blot on my record”, he later declared. (27) His chief of staff, Lawrence Wilkerson, admits to having been duped by the neoconservatives David Wurmser and Douglas Feith, who were virtually “card-carrying members of the Likud party” and having unwittingly “participated in fraud against the American people, the international community and the UN Security Council.” (28)

Israel’s objective, which is much wider, is the destruction of General Wesley Clark’s (29) famous “seven nations”. The number seven, taken from the Bible (30), is purely symbolic and mainly refers to Iraq, Libya, Syria and Iran. This plan was devised in 1982 and is outlined in a document, written in Hebrew by the World Zionist Organization. The existence of this document was revealed to the world by Israel Shahak, who translated it into English. The document’s author, Oded Yinon, describes the multi-ethnic and unstable character of Middle Eastern nations as offering Israel “far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967” and opening a “new epoch in human history”:

“Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian Peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon.” (31)

Indeed, ethnic, tribal and religious feuds form the Achilles heel of Middle Eastern nations, a predictable consequence of their borders, arbitrarily drawn upon the ruins of the Ottoman Empire. The strategy of destruction, therefore, consists of encouraging, organising and arming rebel groups, which are then quickly replaced by extremist mercenaries from all over the world. It is then a matter of making Western public opinion view the conflict as proof of the regime’s brutality, in order to then justify military intervention to “support the rebels”.

After Iraq, Libya was then targeted, at the very moment when Gadaffi was making a rapprochement with the US and Europe. The country’s destruction was delegated to France, which had just back taken into NATO by Nicolas Sarkozy. The chief of the French armed forces, Edouard Guillaud, declared on 26 January 2014, just before his retirement, that:

 “The south of Libya has become an absolute black-hole, a place where terrorists regroup and re-arm. It’s the new centre of gravity for terrorism.” (32)

The hordes of jihadists recruited in Iraq to destroy Libya were then redirected to Syria, in order to trigger the same type of “Arab spring”, where the only alternative to destruction was a puppet government whose leader, Burhan Ghalioun, promised in 2011 to “put an end to military cooperation with Iran, cut weapons and supplies to Hezbollah as well as Hamas, and build relations with Israel.” (33)

Since the true nature of the Syrian “rebels”  (stateless savages, drug users and allies to Al-Qaida) could not be hidden from the public eye for long, there was a need in 2014 to support them more discreetly by, for example, supplying them with weapons via the intermediary of “moderate rebels” or, more directly, “by mistake” (34). Meanwhile Israel took care of their wounded, in order to send them back into combat (35), and occasionally bombed Syrian government positions (36).

Since public opinion was paralysed by confusion, the image of these stone-age cut-throats was conveniently used to demonise Islam (37). A new breed of “Marrano” contributed to this. For example, Adam Pearlman, grandson of a prominent member of the Anti-Defamation League, used the false name of Adam Yahiye Gadahn and adopted the appearance of a Muslim, in order to diffuse videos of anti-American and fundamentalist tirades, before finally being exposed in 2009. Another example is Joseph Leonard Cohen who, using the false name of Youssef Khattab, was a member of the Revolution Muslim group (38). Meanwhile, the FBI and other US undercover secret services continued the “war against terrorism” by encouraging terrorist attacks in America and, no doubt, in Europe, claiming to thwart them at the last minute (39).

Iran is the ultimate target. Netanyahu and his supporters in Washington have, over the past ten years, been striving to demonise Tehran with accusations of the most sinister plots. In 2013, the American billionaire Sheldon Adelson, one the biggest donors to the Republican Party, suggested that the “United States should drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.” He also threatened to use his financial power to destroy any member of the American congress who boycotted the Israeli prime minister’s speech (40).

The return of Putin’s Russia onto the geopolitical stage (despite the Ukrainian coup, which aims to tighten NATO control) has overturned the Zionist plan. But it is not certain that Russia’s support for Syria will be seen as an insurmountable obstacle, because any conflict can, by dint of deft triangulation, allow Israel to move closer to the imperial Greater Israel. And should world war break out between the two blocks ruled by the US and Russia, Israel possesses a formidable asset: the famous Samson Option, a military strategy summed up by Ron Rosenbaum in How the End Begins : The Road to a Nuclear World War III (2012):

“Even if Israel has been obliterated, it can be sure that it’s dolphin-class nuclear missile submarines cruising the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the Persian Gulf, at depths impervious to detection, can carry out a genocidal-scaled retaliation virtually anywhere in the world” (41)

References:

[26] La double imposture du 11 septembre, partie 2 : la fausse bannière réversible et le complot piraté  www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/La-double-imposture-du-11-Septembre-29162.html

[27] Steven Weisman, “Powell Calls His U.N. Speech a Lasting Blot on His Record”, New York Times, 9 septembre 2005,  www.nytimes.com

[28] www.pbs.org/now/politics/wilkerson.html ; Stephen Sniegoski, The Transparent Cabal, op. cit., p. 120.

[29] Wesley Clark, Winning Modern Wars, Public Affairs, 2003, p. 130.

[30] Deuteronomy 7,1-2 ; Joshua 24,11.

[31] Oded Yinon, Le Plan sioniste pour le Moyen-Orient, Sigest, 2015, p. 48, 35, 53-55.

[32] Hassan Hamadé, Lettre ouverte aux Européens coincés derrières le rideau de fer israélo-US , 21 May 2014, www.voltairenet.org/

[33] Joe Quinn, “Syria’s Fake Color Revolution”, in ISIS is US : The Shocking Truth Behind the Army of Terror, Progressive  Press, 2016, page 26.

[34] Les États-Unis larguent “par erreur” des armes à l’État islamique , 23 October 2014,  www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr.

[35] Alain Chémali, Israël officialise son aide aux rebelles syriens tout en défendant les Druzes , 30 June 2015,  geopolis.francetvinfo.fr/israel-officialise-son-aide-aux-rebelles-syriens-tout-en-defendant-les-druzes-68397

[36] Georges Malbrunot, Israël lance deux raids contre la Syrie, Le Figaro, 7 December 2014.

[37] On how public opinion has been reduced to a state of powerlessness, see “Adam Curtis – Oh Dearism” on YouTube.

[38] American al Qaida member acknowledges Jewish ancestry , 13 June 2009, edition.cnn.com ; see “Fake Al Qaeda Actors EXPOSED !”, YouTube.

[39] Glenn Greenwald, The FBI again thwarts its own Terror Plot : Are there so few actual Terrorists that the FBI has to recruit them into manufactured attacks ?, Salon, 2 September 2011, www.salon.com

[40] Jim Wall, Good Morning America, Bibi is Coming to Town , 15 February 2015, mycatbirdseat.com ; “États-Unis/Congrès : un milliardaire juif menace d’humilier les élus anti-Netanyahu”, 7 Ffebruary 2015, www.lemondejuif.info

[41] Ron Rosenbaum, How the End Begins : The Road to a Nuclear World War III, Simon & Schuster, 2012, p. 141-142, 21-2.


Translated from French

 

New World Order Weapons

HAARP: A new weapon?

By Philippe Ploncard d’Assac


In La Politique N° 105 (and in N°108, June 2010), I’d remarked upon the uncanny speed with which the Americans intervened following the Haiti earthquake, as if they had been prepared for it, and I had made the connection to the possibility of using the HAARP system (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme) to trigger earthquakes.

The question I’d asked was:

Is this science fiction ?

“Perhaps, but in this age of the globalist conspiracy, the aim of which is to impose a dictatorship at all costs, anything is possible.”

Today Japan is on its knees because of the Sichuan earthquake, the resulting tsunami and Fukushima nuclear disaster.

Thus, the report written by the north Russian fleet, according to which “the Haiti disaster was probably triggered by the US testing weapons which simulate the effect of an earthquake”, gains yet more credibility.

Especially as this report stated that this “weapon was tested” with the view to “using it against Iran.”

If Iran’s nuclear facilities, buried deep underground, were destroyed in an “earthquake”, nobody would have reason to ask questions!

The president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, condemned “a deliberate attempt to trigger an earthquake”, a statement which appeared sufficiently founded for Fox News and Russia Today to relay this. In addition, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Bolivia demanded that the “UN Security Council be urgently summoned to investigate the charges”

As early as the 1990s, 90 members of the Russian parliament had issued a press release condemning American plans to create “new geophysical weapons which could influence the terrestrial environment by using high frequency radio waves”

If these types of weapons exist, could they be the cause of the earthquake which brought Japan to its knees? Is this not a warning to economic competitors or other countries insufficiently submissive to the New World Order?

It is odd that, for no apparent reason, January 2011 saw the death of thousands of birds, tens of thousands of crabs and hundreds of sea lions, whales, etc. in different parts of the world…

Could the desire for world domination go so far as “state crimes”, as with the September 11 attacks, in order to control any rebellious tendencies?

We believe so, for if the Pentagon, the US Department of Defense, the US Air-Force and the US Navy provides finance for projects, it is not to grow corn, even if it is genetically modified…!

Thus, we ought to take seriously this warning from the website Le projet HAARP:

“The HAARP project has absolutely incredible potential and few people in the world are aware of the profound revolution in systems of control which, in the future, will be used by an elite, whose dream is to control the whole of humanity”

Indeed, this technology can :

  • disrupt the communication systems of satellites
  • change, intercept and control the trajectory of enemy missiles
  • change the weather in given zones (so floods, drought or wildfires, as we saw in Russia this summer, could be programmed)
  • alter the functioning of the brain by electromagnetic radiation
  • scramble navigation and communication systems of civil and military aircraft
  • carry out topographical surveys to locate weapons manufacturers and laboratories
  • trigger earthquakes, etc.

As for the Ionospheric Research Instrument, the next system to be developed, it will be ten times more powerful.

Are these research programmes part of the globalist programme?

They could well correspond to Kabbalastic symbolism – an example of this being the moto “ordo ab chao” inscribed on the dollar bill – cherished by Luciferian secret societies.

In an article entitled “New World Order weapons, have the ability to trigger climate change”, Michel Chossudovsky, economics professor at the University of Ottawa and author of The Globalization of Poverty, notes that:

“From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.”

World renowned scientist Rosalie Bertell confirms that: “American military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon”.

This confirms what the globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in 1970:

“Technology will make available to the leaders of the major nations a variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised.”

Likewise, in Les armes de l’ombre, Marc Filterman, a French army officer, alludes to different types of non-conventional weapons, using radio waves, and “metrological wars”.

The scientific researcher and anti-HAARP campaigner Dr Nick Begich is of the same opinion.

In February 1998, Maj-Britt Theorin, a Swedish Social Democrat MEP, questioned the European Parliament on the HAARP issue, but the commission set up for this purpose declared that it did not have the authority to separate environmental issues from those of defence, “Brussels looking to avoid problems with Washington…”

The problem is that those wishing to play God could see their experiments blow up in their faces. A number of unexplained natural disasters have struck the US of late.

It is perhaps in this way that the paranoia of messianic globalism will trigger the Apocalypse.

Sources :

– Le projet HAARP ( http://www.bibleetnombres.online.fr/haarp.html)
– HAARP, l’arme ultime (conspiration.ca/ haarp_ultime. html)
– machine à tremblement de terre “haarp” au Japon (electra2zeiss.tonempire.net/ 2005-au-japon).
– HAARP Le nouvel ordre mondial (www.nouvelordremondial.cc/cat/haarp
http://www.planet-revelations.com/t2005-machine-a-tremblement-deterre-haarp-au-japon Publié dans La Politique N° 117, avril 2011


Tragedy at Fukushima. A Zionist Crime ?

By Philippe Ploncard d’Assac

In an article which appeared in Rivarol (25/11/11), Michèle Favard-Jirard cites the various sources, according to which the earthquake and the tsunami alone were insufficient to explain the subsequent chain reaction of catastrophes.

As she explains :

“According to certain US intelligence sources, the explosions which shook the Fukushima N°1 nuclear power plant were due to the presence of nuclear warheads, which had been stolen from a nuclear weapons storage facility in the US”

Confirmation of this comes with an article written by a Japanese journalist based in Hong Kong, Yoichi Shimatsu, who blames a secret collaboration between the Americans and the Israelis.

Allegedly, the incident could be traced back to the Japanese prime minister in 2006, Shinzō Abe, who had sought to obtain the nuclear bomb for Japan.

The Japanese newspaper, Yomiuri Shimbun, carried the following story on 27 September 2007:

“Yesterday, we learnt that the government and the utility companies have begun talks with Russia.”

“If Washington refuses the nuclearisation of Japan, Tokyo will turn to Moscow” 

This was an allusion to the Pentagon’s opposition to Japan becoming a nuclear power.

And yet, according to Yoichi Shimatsu, the nuclear material “was authorised by the Americans at the highest level of government, in accordance with a trilateral agreement between the Bush-Cheney team, Ehud Olmert’s Israeli government and the Japanese prime minister Shinzō Abe”

What happened next is strange.

The required nuclear material was stolen from BWXT Pantex plant in Amarillo, Texas. Sixteen tonnes of nuclear warheads were placed in refrigerated containers, to avoid the risk of nuclear fission, and were transported to Houston port, where they were loaded onto ships belonging to an Israeli company…

Then a member of the CIA, Roland Vincent Carnaby, an inspector at the port who had apparently detected that the cargo was radioactive, was killed while he chased a car driven by Israelis !

It is odd that his contract linked him to an Israeli company, Neptune Intelligence Computer Engineering

Everything about this affair is suspicious, beginning with the secret agreement between the Americans, the Israelis and the Japanese.

Yoichi Shimatsu points out that:

“Playing the role of brokers, the Israelis were quick to ask Tokyo for additional fees and, to add insult to injury, had the nerve, before delivery, to swap the warheads with depleted ones, which therefore needed to be enriched.”

When the scam was discovered by the Japanese, they had no other choice but to enrich the uranium cores at Fukushima.

The Japanese demanded to be reimbursed by the Israelis, who refused. This led to reprisals: the Japanese lent their support to the Palestinians at the UN.

It is at this point that the tragedy begins.

To avenge Japanese support for the Palestinians, Mossad had apparently infected the Japanese nuclear plants with Stuxnet, a computer virus which had been deployed in the Iranian nuclear plants 2010. (1)

The Japanese firewall systems resisted the virus until the Tohuku earthquake. The resulting power cut disrupted the control system, removing the firewall.

When the power was reestablished, Stuxnet was activated, disabling the emergency generators.

Thus, for the twenty minutes between the earthquake and the tsunami, the valves and the pumps were disabled. As a result, the water cooling system was cut off.

The overheating in the reactor core would have thus triggered the explosions, which were intensified by two unforeseen external factors:

  • The activation of the virus, which shutdown the safety systems
  • The presence of military nuclear warheads, which needed to be enriched, following the Israeli scam.

We are thus lead to believe that the delivery of this nuclear material to Japan was a trap prepared by the Israelis and the Americans in order to prevent the Japanese from obtaining the nuclear bomb.

The Japanese journalist Yoichi Shimatsu concludes :

“The International Criminal Court has sufficient proof to initiate proceedings related to the health of millions of Japanese, Candians, Americans, Russians, Koreans, Chinese.”

There has been total silence following these revelations. Why?!

(1) Laurent Heslault – Cyber-espionnage pour cyber-sabotage, on France 24.


Translated from French

The original author was Philippe Ploncard d’Assac

Source: http://nationalisme-francais.com/le-drame-de-fukushima-un-crime-sioniste.html

http://nationalisme-francais.com/le-systeme-haarp-une-nouvelle-arme.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mass Immigration

Richard de Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), an Austrian-Japanese aristocrat, was behind the creation of the 1920s Paneuropean Union movement. Promoting a Europe union stretching “from Iceland to Turkey, from Finland to Portugal”, the fundamental principles of this movement recognised self-determination of populations and ethnic groups, Christianity and human rights. But, similar to the ecumenism of the Vatican II reforms, the Paneuropean movement also considered that Judaism and Islam were an integral part of Europe.

Coudenhove-Kalergi’s campaign for a unified Europe earned him the Charlemagne Prize in 1950. Other winners of this prize include Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Jean-Paul II, Simone Veil and Angela Merkel. But his work had a more profound impact on the European project, as he wrote Praktischer Idealismus (“Practical Idealism”), which is something of a blueprint for a world without borders.  Two key points emerge from this programme.

First of all, Coudenhove-Kalergi considers the prime objective to be the creation of a political and economic elite, “a nobility of European spirit”. Between the collapse of the nobility in 1789 and the formation of a new elite, “our democratic age is an abysmal interlude between two great aristocratic epochs”. He even adds : “As soon as a new and genuine nobility has been created, democracy will disappear of its own accord.”

This new ruling class can emerge only by bringing together the greatest minds from the nobility, the bourgeoisie and Judaism:

“The nobility of the future will be neither feudal, nor Jewish, nor bourgeois nor proletarian: it will be synthetic…It’s only through an alliance with the best bourgeois blood that the most capable members of the former nobility will reach new heights; it is only through a union with the non-Jewish members from the European ruling class that the Jewish element of tomorrow’s nobility will achieve its full potential…”

The second point is that the creation of this globalist ruling-class, steeped in Gnosticism (Coudenhove believed Christianity to be “Judaism regenerated”), should go hand-in-hand with interracial marriage on a planetary scale. Indeed, Coudenhove considered that crossbreeding enhances human physical and moral qualities: “The consanguineous human has just one sole; a human of mixed-race has several.” He then added a statement which has lost none of its relevance in the context of today’s borderless European Union: “The human being of the distant future will be of mixed-race… The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals..”

Richard de Coudenhove-Kalergi and the other members of the globalist clergy would doubtless be satisfied with the technocratic and cosmopolitan evolution of the European Union, which is far removed from the national traditions which once made Europe great.

See also: https://geostrategieblog.wordpress.com/immigration-catastrophe-a-treasonous-plot-to-destroy-nations/


Translated from French

The originial author was Pierre Hillard

Source: Boulevard Voltaire

 

Zionism

From Jewish Messianism to Zionism

Arrêt-sur-Info interviews Youssef Hindi (1), author of Occident et Islam.


I read your book (Occident & Islam) with great interest. I like the fact that you are rigorous in the citation of your sources, which seem irrefutable. I think it is essential to highlight this when dealing with such a controversial issue. In particular, you quote the leading expert in Jewish mysticism, Gershom Scholem (1897-1982), founder of the chair of Kabbalah at the Hebrew University of Jersusalem.  […] Why did you want to make an in depth study of such a controversial subject?  

First of all, I wasn’t satisfied with the two main theories on the origins of Zionism. According to the first theory, Zionism was founded by Theodor Herzl and the World Zionist Congress. The alternative theory, which is lesser known and supported by several historians, including Shlomo Sand, claims that English protestants during the 17th century wanted to repatriate the Jews in the Holy Land, in order to hasten the return of Christ. I do not support this second theory either, as I was already aware that the idea of hastening the return of the messiah by means of political action was not originally a Christian idea but one which came from Jewish messianism. And so, in order to discover the true origin of Zionism, I knew that I would need to study Jewish messianism, in particular by going back to Kabbalah (the occult tradition of Judaism, said to be the “unwritten and secret law” given to Moses by God) which is the source of messianism, which I term “active messianism” in my book. Kabbalah was, therefore, the starting point for my research. I then began to study its origins, its purposes and its various concepts. My aim was to go back in history to identify the person who opened Pandora’s box.

In the book, you talk about “active messianism”. You say that your book aims to give us the keys for deciphering the modern world, and that going back in the past allows you to have a perspective which is highly relevant to today’s world. We are faced with geopolitical events and the chaos they cause in the Middle East. If we do not understand the underlying causes of events today, then it’s impossible to see what is really happening. This is why this book is important: it allows us to discover the origins of messianic Judaism and its consequences. You state that the origins of Kabbalah can be traced back to 1st century Palestine. During the 11th century, Kabbalah gradually spread across Europe. It then gathered momentum in 13th century Spain with Nachmanides (Moses ben Nahman) and Abraham Abulafia (Abraham ben Samuel Abulafia). You also explain that, in the beginning, Kabbalah was considered to be a dangerous heresy by the Jewish orthodoxy, but that it nonetheless gradually infiltrated Judaism.

Kabbalah is a mystical movement which dates from the 1st century. For over a thousand years, until the late Middle Ages, the Talmudists, the defenders of official Jewish orthodoxy, fought against Kabbalah. The Kabbalists mission was to ensure that Kabbalah formed an integral part of the Jewish orthodoxy. And they succeeded! As I explain in my book, almost all Kabbalist concepts have been integrated into the Jewish orthodoxy. At the end of the Middle Ages, a fusion took place between the orthodox Judaism of the Torah, the Talmud and Kabbalah. Kabbalah managed to reach the heart of the Jewish orthodoxy.

You retrace the steps of Solomon Molcho during the 16th century. Could you tell us something about this character and his importance in the development of Zionism?

Solomon Molcho (1500-1532) was a wandering rabbi and David Reubeni’s pupil. Under the influence of Reubeni, he attempted to convince the Pope to raise an army of Marrano Jews to attack the Ottoman Empire in Palestine and expel the Ottomans from the Holy Land, in order to recreate the Kingdom of Israel. His attempt failed because he was wanted by the Inquisition. But he was protected by Pope Clement VII and fled with Reubeni to meet one of the most powerful men in Europe, Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor.  Again, he proposed to attack the Ottoman Empire. This ends very badly, because Charles V had David Reubeni imprisoned in Spain and handed Solomon Molcho over to the Inquisition, which had him burnt at the stake. One of Molcho’s main goals was to influence Christians, to have them accept Jewish messianic views. In one of his treaties, he said that Christians should be the target of political actions with a messianic goal, in order to reconstruct the Kingdom of Israel. And he laid down one of the key stones for what later becomes Judeo-Christianity. He simply attempted to accomplish a messianic mission which predated him. This is what I explain in my book.

You explain that Jewish messianism gave birth to Protestant messianism. During the 16th century, Kabbalah gradually infiltrated the Christian world, as a result of efforts made by the rabbi Isaac Luria (Lurianic Kabbalah). During the 17th century, Kabbalah infiltrated the Muslim world because of Sabbatai Zevi (Sabbatean Kabbalah) and the Dönmeh. From the 15th century onwards, Christianity began to be destroyed from within by the Marranos (Spanish Jews who pretended to convert Christianity). Could you tell us about the Protestant restoration movement and then tell us a bit more about Jacob Frank, an infiltrator?

Yes, Jacob Frank had infiltrated Catholicism in the 18th century. He claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi. We should note that Marranism concerned the Spanish Jews whom the Christians, following the Reconquista (the Alhambra Decree of 1492), had decided to expel from the country. The Marranos were the Jews who had pretended to convert to Christianity in order to stay in Spain. From then on, a culture of concealment developed. This was termed Marranism, but in fact this culture of concealment was already present in Jewish culture. False conversions have always been commonplace in the Jewish tradition, be it in the European world or in the age of Muhammad, during the 7th century, when rabbis pretended to convert to Islam.

As regards Kabbalah’s inflitration into the Christian world, this is explained in detail in a chapter of my latest book. This movement begins in the late 13th century, but successful attempts were made during the second half of the 15th century, when Kabbalist Jews started to teach Christians, the most well-known among them being Jean Pic de la Mirandole.  His master taught him Hebrew, Chaldee and initiated him in Kabbalah. Together they created a Christian version of Kabbalah, in order to subject the Christian world to Jewish ideas. In other words, they attempted to convince Christians, and even the Vatican, that Kabbalah can in fact explain Christian doctrines, such as the Holy Trinity. This Christian Kabbalah, which took root first in Italy and then in France, continued to develop in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries in England and Germany at the height of the Protestant age.

At the same time, during the 16th century, Isaac Luria, chief rabbi of Safed, intensified the messianic dimension of Kabbalah. He developed a theory of political action, which is much more proactive than that of Spanish Kabbalah. And it is Luria’s version of Kabbalah which spread across Europe. The Christian version of Kabbalah, the birth of Protestantism, and this wave of messianic Kabbalism developed by Luria all came together during the 17th century, which saw the birth of the millenarian Christian restoration movement. English Protestants spearheaded the project for the repatriation of the Jews in the Holy Land. The Restoration Movement had influential leaders during the 17th and 18th centuries. But it is only really during the 19th century that the Zionist project began to take shape. This Zionist project, then, needed centuries before finally coming to fruition because the necessary political, ideological and geopolitical conditions had to be met.

In your book, you also look at another chapter in history, namely the subversive  movements in Islam and their links to messianic Judaism. In particular, you look at Wahhabism during the 18th century and the 19th century Islamic Modernist movement, which gave rise to the Muslim Brotherhood. Could you elaborate on this point?

In the second half of the book, I begin my examination of the 17th century with Sabbatai Zevi, a Kabbalist rabbi who developed an antinomian theology, i.e. one which is against divine law and which reverses all values and is therefore, strictly speaking, Satanic. From 1666 onwards, he and his disciples pretend to convert to Islam. He urges his disciples, in other words hundreds of families, to infiltrate Islam and destroy it from within. To prove this, I provide all the evidence, including quotes from Gershom Scholem. The Dönmeh are the direct descendants of this Sabbatean movement. They are Turkish Jews who pretended to convert to Islam and were at the origin of the Young Turk reform movement. The 19th century saw the birth of Islamic Modernism, which was a purely Masonic initiative, as it was connected with all the networks linked to the Young Turk movement.

In Europe, the Frankists were members of Masonic networks. Indeed, European Frankists and Turkish Sabbateans remained in permanent contact until the end of the 19th century. In parallel, both movements achieved the same objective by using the same means: the destruction of Christian Europe and the Islamic East.

We could go further by including Wahhabism, which developed during the 18th century, but there is no solid proof of a link between Wahhabism and Sabbateanism. When we examine Wahhabism, however, we do find striking similarities not only between these two movements but also with Cromwell’s revolution in 17th century England. Wahhabism and the Islamic Modernism shaped the Muslim world from within and, via the disciples of Muhammad Abduh, both these movements ultimately merged to form the Muslim Brotherhood, founded by Hassan al-Banna. They are, therefore, two parallel schools of thought which function dialectically.

I should point out that the founding fathers of Islamic Modernism during the 19th century (Jamal al-Din Al-Afghani and Muhammad Abduh) and many of their disciples were freemasons. Indeed, in Egypt during the 1870s, both Al-Afghani and Abduh, in liaison with their Masonic networks, attempted to stage a great revolution, known as the Urabi Revolution. The modernists adhered to the same subversive ideology (albeit diluted and tinged with progressivism) as the Sabbateans, the Young Turks, the French revolutionaries and the Frankists.

Could you clarify what Masonic lodges are?

We can answer this question from various angles. I take a unique approach by showing how the Masonic lodges, which in fact are networks, were used by the Sabbateans and the Frankists to subvert both Christian and Muslim world from within. In addition, as I explain in the book, there exists a whole variety of Masonic lodges: some are ideologically neutral, some quite clearly adhere to Satanism, while others are either theistic or Judeo-Christian.  What I wanted to show was how those Masonic lodges were used by the Sabbateans, the Frankists and, later on, by those in the Islamic Modernist movement in order to subvert both the Christian and the Muslim world.

And always indirectly, in an underhand fashion, never open and direct?

Yes, always indirectly. It’s a surreptitious subversion. I demonstrate this by using copious references.

I wanted to touch upon the ulema (Sunni theologians) and Al-Azhar University. You say they are opposed to the Wahhabi doctrine. Could you tell us more about them, in order to show that there are schools of thought in the Islamic world which attempt to fight against Wahhabism?

Al-Azhar is the University of Cairo, historically the centre of Sunni Islamic thought (for the modern era, in any case). This university, together with other universities elsewhere in the world, have always virulently opposed Wahhabism which originated in Najd, Saudi Arabia.

We shouldn’t forget that Muhammad Rashid Rida, a disciple of Muhammad Abduh, was financed during the 1920s by the Saudis, notably by the newspaper al-Manar. Together with his disciples, he attacked the ulema of al-Azhar, opponents of Wahhabism. Rashid Rida attacked the enemies of Wahhabism, defended the Wahhabi doctrine and portrayed Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab as a great reformer!

At a conference, held in Grozny in June 2016, the world’s leading Sunni theologians, including the Grand Mufti of Egypt (Shawki Allam) and the Grand Mufti of Damascus (Abdul Fattah), decreed that Salafist Wahhabism was a non-Sunni doctrine, excluded from Sunnism (a clear reference to Wahhabi and Takfiri groups supported by Saudi Arabia).

Thank you for highlighting this vital point. Indeed, the press briefly made mention of this. To come back to your research on Jewish messianism and how it developed over the centuries, you detail the origins of political and atheist messianism, which was later to became Zionism during the 19th and 20th centuries. You refer to the Balfour Declaration and the Sykes-Picot Agreements as well as the restructuring of the Middle East. Could you also tell us about the historian Henry Laurens (2) and the Greater Israel project? Could you then make a brief analysis of the current situation in relation to what is happening in Syria today? Could you describe the key players who mainly act outside of Israeli territory and who work to accomplish the messianic mission?

The Zionist project has undergone many changes, the most important of which took place during the 19th century. In the book, I demonstrate that Zionism is but one element of the global messianic project. During the 19th century, certain religious ideas and messianic projects took on an atheist, materialist and secular form. Zionism was one of these messianic ideas which became “secularised”, as it was portrayed as a project to create a Jewish homeland in order to protect the Jews from pogroms, etc. But this was mere propaganda. In truth, the aim was to accomplish the biblical mission. Indeed, from the early 20th century, Zionists, such as Theodor Herzl, defended the project to create an Israel defined by biblical borders, stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. David Ben-Gurion stated this in writing in 1918, which was even before the creation of Israel.

In truth, therefore, this religious project, falsely portrayed as being atheist, was just a facade and a means of accomplishing a mission which, at the time, could not be openly couched in religious terms.

In the early phases of the execution of the Zionist project, in 1882 for instance, Edmond de Rothschild began buying land in Palestine. The Zionists then attempted to convince the Ottoman Sultan, the Kaiser and then the British to create a Jewish homeland. In the end, it was the British who took charge of this project. In 1916, before the end of the First World War, the British were losing against the Germans. The Zionists then proposed them a deal: they persuaded the Americans to join the British in the war against Germany, in exchange for which the British attacked the Ottoman Empire in Palestine in order to create a Jewish homeland. From the start, therefore, we can see that Jewish international finance influenced Western powers from within in order to have them endorse the Zionist project. This method was used throughout the 20th century. From 1948, the US politically and financially supported Israel.

By drawing on the work of John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, I demonstrate in the final part of the book how the pro-Israeli lobby pushed the US to destroy the Muslim world (Iraq, Syria) in order to pave the way for the creation of Greater Israel, planned long ago (4). I then quote the Oded Yinon plan, written in 1982. The neoconservative plan to restructure the Middle East, the “Greater Middle East Initiative” is nothing other than the execution of the Oded Yinon plan. Indeed, following September 11, the pro-Israel lobby pushed the US to carry out the destruction of the Arab states bordering Israel, in order to allow Israel to expand its territory in the future. This was the goal at the outset and it remains so today.

You also discuss the fact that messianism has reached fever pitch in Israel, as well as the connection between American neoconservatism and the current Israeli government and its links to Jewish religious leaders. Could you explain this, as those who are not experts in the field do not necessarily realise that there is a link between the two?

Jews form the nucleus of neoconservatives in the United States. They are in fact former Trotskyites who had shifted to the right. Their political mission is modelled on the Zionist project and that of the millenarian Protestants. And it is these American neoconservatives, the hardcore of which is Jewish, who collaborate with the pro-Israel lobby and work in the interests of Israel. Using a number of quotes, I demonstrate very clearly that these people do not work in the interests of the United States. Nor do they even work in the interests of American imperialism. They in fact strive to accomplish the Israeli mission. At the same time, I show that the current Israeli administration (dating from at least 2012) is, historically speaking, the most messianic government that Israel has ever known.

For instance, I cite Charles Enderlin. It’s not that I criticise him, but I don’t think he has understood the problem, because he believes that the phenomenon corresponds to the conquest of holy sites which began with the 1967 war. This is false. I explain that we are seeing a resurgence of Jewish messianism which gave birth to the Zionist project.  As I demonstrate in the book, primary causes shape outcomes, and do so even over many centuries. So we shouldn’t be surprised to see those who represent the biblical orthodoxy come to power in Israel because, in truth, they never lost control of the country!

David Ben-Gurion himself wrote that socialism was merely a means to accomplish the Zionist mission. All these political movements which appear to be atheist are just tools for the Israelis and the messianic Jews. This is why atheist Jews, secular Jews and religious Jews do not truly oppose each other. Regardless of whether they are atheist, secular or socialist, Jewish opinion converges at this stage of the messianic project. They disagree as to the means, but they all agree on the end goal.

In particular, you quote the Book of Joshua, often mentioned by Israeli political leaders, including Benjamin Netanyahu. Could you explain the religious dimension to the construction of Israel?

In the final chapter, I show that the creation of the Jewish homeland – its method of conquest and its ultimate goal – is based on the Book of Joshua (the destruction of villages, expulsion or massacre of the inhabitants). Beyond this aspect, I make a comparison between stages of conquest in the Book of Joshua and the successive stages towards the creation of the Jewish homeland and Greater Israel. And this is very salutary…

You quote Ovadia Yosef (1920-2013), the controversial Israeli rabbi. Could you tell us more about him?

By discussing Ovadia Yosef, I wanted to highlight the underlying influence of religious leaders on Israeli policy. He is not an isolated case. There is also the chief rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994) who lectured Netanyahu, urging him to take action to hasten the coming of the messiah. In 1967 and 1973, Ariel Sharon sought rabbi Schneerson’s advice on military issues, even though Sharon is not religious.

To come back to Ovadia Yosef, I explain that he was a key player in Israeli policymaking, because all Israeli leaders went to him for advice. The religious orthodoxy plays a key role in the making of Israeli geopolitical policy. This is why, throughout the history of Israel, we can see the application of both Jewish laws and the implementation of a programme based on the Old Testament.  As I demonstrate in the book, rabbis throughout history focused on using the bible to develop both a theology and a praxeology, and turned this into a political instrument as well as a geopolitical project.

Some of the statements made by Ovadia Yosef are so racist and abhorrent they chill the blood. Regarding the Palestinians, he declared that “It is forbidden to have pity on them. We must give them missiles with relish, annihilate them.” (2001 Passover sermon. Cf. Haaretz, April 12, 2001) […]

As I explain, he was not a lone eccentric. He is a chief rabbi who advised politicians. Even Israeli army generals sought his advice in the preparation of the war against Iran. He was a key figure in Israel and is certainly not the only one to hold these views.

In order to demonstrate that he was influential, you quote a member of the Knesset (the Israeli parliament) who, during the Israeli bombardment of Gaza in 2014, called for the death of all Palestinian mothers ?  

Yes, you are referring to the ultra-nationalist Ayelet Shaked, who went on to become a minister. I also quote the Knesset’s vice-president, Moshe Feiglin, who proposes to expel the Palestinians from Gaza and drive them into the Sinai. As in the Book of Joshua, he quite calmly explains that Gaza’s infrastructure should be destroyed with full force. The resemblance to the following passage in the Book of Joshua (6:24) is striking: “And they burnt the city with fire, and all that was therein.” Feiglin mentions “no consideration for human shields” which basically means that those who refuse to leave Gaza should be wiped out in order to ethnically cleanse the entire city. We should remember that we are talking about the vice-president of the Knesset here!

Could you give us your analysis of the current situation in Syria and that of what happened in Iraq ?

The destruction of Iraq, Libya and Syria is not directly linked to American vital interests, contrary to what the majority of geopolitical analysts say. Nor is it linked to any desire to control the oil reserves. As John Mearsheimer (3) and Stephen Walt demonstrate, if the Americans had wanted to seize control of the Iraqi oil fields, all they had to do was put pressure on Saddam Hussein, and he would have gladly accepted!

Indeed, during the 1990s, President Assad did nothing but reach out to Israel and the USA for the sake of peace. And each time the Americans wanted to come to an agreement with the Iranians or the Syrians the Israeli lobby systematically stepped in. Why? Because the Israeli lobby’s ultimate goal is the destruction of those countries. Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer have clearly demonstrated that it was in fact the Israeli lobby, not the oil lobby, which pushed the US to destroy Iraq. Indeed, Bernard-Henri Lévy, who participated in the destruction of Libya, declared before the CRIF (Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions) that he did as a Jew. It has to be understood, then, that he did this as an Israeli agent.

The main reason for the tension between Russia and America on the Syrian issue is the Israeli project. As I explain in the preface to my book, the Russians, the Iranians and the Syrians are not fighting against American imperialism but against the Israeli project, executed and endorsed by the Americans to their own detriment. American imperialists are not the friends of humanity, but, as Carl Shmitt put it, we should correctly identify the principal enemy.

Needless to say, American imperialism (and all that it entails) is one of the problems – if not the main problem – for the world today. But if the Americans were to return to the isolationist Monroe doctrine, as Trump would like to, the problem would be solved. Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of America’s greatest geostrategists, understood that basing American foreign policy on that of Israel’s jeopardised the future of the United States.

Both the destruction of Syria and perhaps even the future US-Russian war, which remains a possibility, both have the same root cause: the Israeli imperialist project. This should be born in mind.

How do you explain that so few people – in the West, at any rate – are aware of this ? And why do so few people speak out against it?

First of all, we cannot publically speak out against it in the West because both the media and the political system are tightly controlled. But if you were to go to the Middle East, for instance, you can openly give your opinion on this matter. The Western world, especially Europe and the US, has a politicised media system which prevents any form of free debate of this issue. It is not difficult to understand why. Just take any of the major TV channels or newspapers and then go to the top of the chain of command: here you often find Jewish, Israeli or even Protestant multimillionaires as well as arms dealers. We shouldn’t, therefore, be surprised that we do not have complete freedom of speech in the West.

If we now look at dissident circles, those who criticise American imperialism and even Zionism, we see another problem, which is methodological in nature. The work of geopolitical analysts often lacks historical depth, because they base their work on statistics and the study of energy resources, believing this to be the be all and end all of geopolitics. The religious, ideological and messianic dimension is totally ignored. This is why I wrote the book, in order to provide a new and different way to interpret modern history, an interpretation which appears to me to be more effective than geopolitics as it currently stands.

March 2017



Translated from French

Source: Arrêt sur Info

arretsurinfo.ch/du-messianisme-juif-au-sionisme-contemporain


(1) Youssef Hindi is a write and historian, specialising in the study of messianic eschatology. Born in Morocco, he emigrated to France at a very young age, which led him to develop his thinking on the necessary reconciliation between northern and southern Mediterranean countries. Since time immemorial, the destinies of these two worlds have been inextricably linked.

(2) Henry Laurens, historian, states that : “The Yishuv (Jewish community) was established as an absolute refusal to collaborate economically and socially with the Arab population. Jewish exclusionism, necessary for the construction of a Jewish homeland, meant that any interaction with the Arab sector was considered as being a failure which needed to be addressed. The historical ambiguity of Zionism as a nationalist and secular definition of this community, hitherto defined by religious criteria, transformed the Yishuv into a hybrid: a public group having the right to call itself a “people” but whose membership criteria are defined by religious affiliation”

(3)  http://arretsurinfo.ch/reprise-le-lobby-israelien/

(4) David Ben-Gurion stated in 1938: “[I am] satisfied with part of the country, but on the basis of the assumption that after we build up a strong force following the establishment of the state–we will abolish the partition of the country and we will expand to the whole Land of Israel.”

 

Freemasonry, Revolutions and Wars

THE GLOBALIST UTOPIA

From its very inception, Masonic ideology contained all the heresies of the modern age. These contribute to the destruction of European nations, empires, societies and their foundation: the Catholic faith.

Image associée

Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the secret society the Illuminati of Bavaria, declared to its members:

“We must establish an authoritarian, universal regime, a form of government which covers the entire world”

“It is in the privacy of secret societies that we must shape public opinion” (1)

This is what nationalists fight against. Weishaupt condemned these “partisans of National Pride” in his letters, seized by the Elector of Bavaria’s police.

Another revealing text is the La Marseillaise des Franc-Maçons written by Jouy (2) :

“The Universal Repbulic is merely the temple of the Masons; they drew the blueprint of this from their symbolic lessons”

The utopian dream of the Universal Republic has not changed.

In 1968, Roger Leray, the Grand Master of the Grand-Orient lodge, reminded the General Assembly of Freemasons (3) that:

“Two hundred years ago, Chevalier Ramsay declared the Universal Republic”.

“Ever since, Freemasons the world over have indefatigably contributed to its construction.”

Likewise, Patrick Kessel (4) in his inaugural speech declared that :

“The Freemasons of the Grand-Orient de France have a project, a task, a hope: the Universal Republic.”

We shouldn’t believe that this utopia is unique to the atheist Grand-Orient whereas other Masonic orders are, supposedly, different and “trustworthy”, as some would try to have us believe. Guy Piau (5), Grand Master of the Grande Loge de France, takes care to open the eyes of the gullible by pointing out that:

The quest for both a European and world community falls within the ambit of our thoughts and our actions.”

And it is confirmed that :

“Freemasons from the Grand-Orient are not the only ones to advocate the destruction of nations; those from the Grand Loge adopt the same language”

“For the Freemasons, the construction of a European zone is merely the precursor to the creation of a universal territory, the entire planet as a homeland

In Europe-Parlement, a private publication reserved for politicians, Richard Dupuy (6), (7), also Grand Master of the Grande Loge de France, confirmed what the common goal was:

“We work for the creation of a Universal Republic and this Republic depends on Europe”

So we should have no illusions. All Masonic orders and their “fellows” work to achieve the same goal, as confirmed by J Baylot (8), another Grand Master of the Grand Loge Nationale:

“Each order has its own specific characters and language but, in truth, members all receive the same Masonic instruction, leading to the same goal”

“The lodges will give way to Masonism, which will be a universal religion”

It couldn’t be any clearer and we can see that, after two centuries, the goal remains the same:

Universal Republic, universal religion, Masonism

Another revealing text can be found in Travaux (T.XI, p.3.), published by the Grande Loge de France:

“The Grande Loge de France has the great advantage of welcoming among its midst members from different orders who have their own particular rituals”

This is in no way a problem for them because

“All fellows agree on the fundamental principles, otherwise they could not be Freemasons”

Could there be any better proof of the fact that all Masonic orders work to achieve the same goal?

These documents show that the Grande Loge Nationale de France is no more “trustworthy” than the other lodges, contrary to what some of its agents, who claim to no longer be Masons, would try to have us believe (9).

To ensure that this “universal, Masonic religion” or “Masonism” was viable, it was necessary not only to destroy Catholicism but also its political foundation: the nations which drew their inspiration from Catholicism, monarchies based on the divine right of kings.

The new nation of the revolutionaries has no connection with the natural homeland, the product of previous generations.

In 1993, the Grand Master of the Grand-Orient, Gilbert Abergel, recalled that:

“As early as 1987, during the draft stages of this reform (of the law governing the entitlement to French nationality, replacing the principle of jus sanguinis with that of jus soli) our order – via the Grand Master at the time, Jean-Robert Ragache (10) – had reiterated in Le Monde its commitment to the republican idea of nationality which ruled out all use of the jus sanguinis principle as the foundation of French nationality”

So the Freemasons, in the execution of their globalist plot, rely on the principle of jus soli in order to drown nations in a vast inflow of foreigners, thereby preventing any nationalist backlash.

Bush’s condemnation of Austria’s immigration policy in 2000, reported by Roger Cohen in the New York Times, demonstrates how the globalists rely on immigration to “break down the barrier of the nation”.

This passage from the Contrat maçonnique européen (11) provides further evidence of the development of this policy:

“The European ideal, a vital element of universalism, is inherent in the Masonic tradition, which declares that the construction of a Masonic Europe is necessary”.

Following the triumph of internationalist ideas of the French Revolution, the new nation of the Freemasons was defined in ideological terms. All those who adhere to these “new ideals” belong to this “nation”, regardless of their religious beliefs or national origins. In order to properly understand this total transformation of the concept of a nation, we have to go back to Weishaupt.

In the letters he wrote to his followers, he divided his contemporaries into two categories:

Those who, like him, adhered to what he called love of the world, the ancestor of globalist cosmopolitanism.

Those whose acts are motivated by love of the nation (12). His followers were urged to fight these nationalists.

It is clear that, right from the very inception of the Masonic utopia, the two camps were already diametrically opposed to each other

On the one hand, we have the citizens of the world, the globalists for whom the new nation is planetary in nature, the Universal Republic.

On the other hand, we have those who understand the grave consequences of these revolutionary, internationalist ideas and who fight against this utopia. Henceforth we will call them nationalists.

We must emphasise the importance of these definitions and the historical origins of the nationalist ideal. Some people wrongly believe that the Jacobins were nationalists, because they declared that the “homeland was in danger”. To believe this is to fail to understand that words did not have the same meaning and purpose. The revolutionaries defended the “new” nation, which was “ideological”, “internationalist”, and was opposed to the inherited, traditional nation.

The following statement from Point de Vue Initiatique (13) is very clear:

“Citizenship is open to all those who identify with the values of the Republic, whether they be foreigners or natives”

Nicolas Sarkozy’s declaration clearly expressed the same principle:

“I don’t want any more talk about native-born French”

We understand why, because he doesn’t belong to this category!

So for the revolutionaries of 1789 and their heirs, the nation and the homeland are mere ideological constructions which reject the idea of the nation as a heritage, a nation inherited with all its defining cultural characteristics.

This is why Anacharsis Cloots, a Prussian Jew and one of the key foreign agents of the so-called “French” Revolution, was granted French nationality by the Convention upon publication of his book, entitled The Universal Republic

Résultat de recherche d'images pour

As far as the members of the Convention were concerned, the key criterion to be French was the identification with the internationalist “values of the republic”.

A fact rarely highlighted is the large number of foreigners involved in the French Revolution:  Cloots, Marat, Necker, Franklin, Weishaupt, Cagolistro, Mesmer, to take just the most famous names, not to mention Israelites from France and elsewhere, who actively participated in the revolutionary turmoil and financed it.

Likewise, the ranks of the republican army were full of foreign officers committed to “new ideas”. Many of them went on to play a role in the revolutions in their own countries, in particular in Spain and Latin America during decolonisation.

Another type of nation, which aimed to destroy the traditional nation, emerged from this revolutionary process.

On the one hand, we have the nation of heritage which represents the intellectual, moral, spiritual capital, gradually built up by previous generations, that is to say everything which has come to form the unique character of each nation.

On the other hand, we have the new and artificial homeland, the ideological nation, which rejects and hates national heritage. This is a new nation made of men who are supposedly equal and undifferentiated. The only thing these men have in common is their commitment to the revolutionary utopia, irrespective of their nationality. (12)

From this perspective, nationality no longer defines the individual; it is ideology which defines the individual and, according to this logic, the nation of heritage will gradually disappear to the point where it is no longer the defining framework or reference point for the citizen who is now a “citizen of the world”. Consequently, the nation is regarded as superfluous.

Such is the inherent and destructive logic of globalism, the product of the Masonic utopia, the disastrous consequences of which we can see today.

Jacques Ploncard d’Assac (14) made a cogent analysis of this programmed destruction:

“Nations no longer form a coherent whole.”

“Things have somehow lasted through force of habit, but, as the principles which form the idea of nation disappear, the masses become once again open to the artificial regroupings of stateless technocrats.”

“Societies are to be portrayed as being sorts of refugee camps where men from all over the world will work for an unnamed and gigantic company in exchange for a salary and a home, their work having no precise meaning in an extinct historical community”

This is precisely what certain groups, at the time of the Revolution, were fighting against. This is why the Freemason Weishaupt warned his followers of those he called “nationalists”. They were liable to endanger these Masonic and globalist ideas.

Once the monarchy gave way to revolutionary ideas and certain “initiated” members of the aristocracy, such as Philippe Egalité, started to collude with financial speculators (most of whom were either Jewish or Protestants from England) to corner the market for consumer goods in order to drive up their price (sparking widespread anger), the nationalist backlash, which worried Weishaupt, emerged by default from a monarchy which had surrendered its role. (12)

Understanding the darker purpose of the Masonic internationalist conspiracy, Joseph de Maistre (who had decided to leave both the Freemasons and the Martinist Order) had identified exactly what was really underlying the Revolution and where it would lead society and the nation (15). In a letter to viscount de Bonald, he wrote:

“Nations are destroyed by conquest, that is to say by invasion. But in this case we have an important question. Without being invaded or transplanted, can a nation die on its own soil just through decay, simply by letting corruption reach its heart and the founding principles which define its character? This is a serious and daunting problem. At this point, France and the French no longer exist. Rome is no longer in Rome and everything is lost.” (16)

This question precisely defines the process which began with the Revolution and which, if nations fail to take action, will conclude with the programmed destruction of nations. It is at the root of every nationalist analysis.


(1) Augustin Barruel. Mémoires pour servir à l‘Histoire du Jacobinisme.

Londres 1798.

(2) Humanisme. février 1998, p.1 78-1 79.

(3) ibid, juillet l969.

(4) ibid, N°219, décembre 1994, p. 51.

(5) Points de Vue Initiatiques, 1989, N°71.

(6) Jacques Ploncard d’ Assac. Le secret des Francs-maçons.

(7) Serge de Beketch wrote of him that he was his “dear friend”

(8) J. Baylet. Oswald Wirth, 1860-1943.

(9) Philippe Ploncard d’ Assac. Enquête sur la Nouvelle-Droite et ses Compagnons de route.

(10) His friendship and his literary dealings with the aetheist and now deceased Jean Mabire, editor of National Hebdo, are well known.

(11) Humanisme, N° 213, décembre, 1993, p. 93

(12) Philippe Ploncard d’Assac. Le Nationalisme français.

(13) Point de Vite Initiatique N° 97, mars 1995, p. 132,

(14) Jacques Ploncard d’ Assac. Les idées qui tuent, p. 34,

(15) The Freemasons and their supporters conceal his criticism of Masonic ideoglogy and the Revolution.

(16) Letter to viscount de Bonald, 1.12.1814, in Lettres et Opuscules, T. I. P· 243 ·



INTERNATIONAL FINANCE, REVOLUTIONS AND WARS

“Without being invaded or transplanted, can a nation die on its own soil just through decay, simply by letting corruption reach its heart and the founding principles which define its character?”

Joseph de Maistre’s question leads us to examine the means by which the “founding principles” of a nation are endangered.

We have already discussed the political and financial role of numerous Jews in the French Revolution, in particular Marat, Necker, Cloots and Weishaupt.

The means by which this plan is put into action are always the same, as demonstrated by declaration made by Paul Walberg, a Jewish financier, before the American Senate:

“We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”

Twenty years later, Baron Edmond de Rothschild (1), comes back to the same obsession:

The barrier which must be breached is the nation!” 

Prior to this, certain members of the Jewish community, in particular Sigmund Warburg, Arman Hammer and Jakob Schiff, had supported the Bolshevik Revolution from its very beginning. This gives credence to what the American historian Ivor Benson (2) observed. He considered international Communism to be:

“The explosive needed to destroy Christian nations”

This explains the ease with which the Soviet Union collapsed. Once Communism had completed its designated task of destruction, it became more profitable for its backers, the cosmopolitan plutocracy, to open new markets in the ex-USSR by destroying it from the inside! There was no need for intervention by Pope Jean-Paul II, who had refused to sanctify Russia at the Sacré-Coeur. The globalist elite which had backed Communism decided to change its strategy, and this alone was enough for it to disappear. This is the truth of what appeared to be the opposition between cosmopolitan capitalism and Marxism, both of which are merely two sides of the same coin, namely atheist materialism, which is opposed to Christian society.

The continuation of this globalist desire to destroy nations can be seen in the statements made by French official representatives of Judaism, who express their hatred of France:

Bernard-Henry Lévy, (3)

“Hurray for everything which can contribute to the destruction of reactionary mythologies of the nation-state, chauvinistic nationalism, region, bagpipes and folklore”

The same hatred of the nation is also expressed by Georges-Marc Benamou (4) :

“Everything to do with region, berets, drunkenness, bagpipes, in short anything typically French and jingoistic is alien to us, not to say abhorrent”

As for Pierre Bergé, patron of the Globe and various gay magazines, he claimed that:

“Homeland is the most hateful word for us”

Us ? What does he mean by “us” ?! A statement made by Jean Khan, president of the Jewish European Congress, leaves no room for doubt:

My political party is the Jewish people”

In addition, he considered that:

“Any form of reference to the baptism of Clovis constitutes a very strong incitement to racial hatred” and he called for a “crack down on any reference of this kind”

In the light of certain statements, we can see what lies behind this hatred of nations.

In his memoirs, the globalist Jean Monnet (7), one of the “fathers of Europe” and an American agent revealed the objective:

“The European community itself is merely a step towards the organizational structures of tomorrow”

This is what all Masonic orders declare, while obsessively striving for the creation of the Universal Republic,  as we have seen above.

Jean Gandois, who was president of the CNPF (National Council of French Directors), made a revealing remark:

“Labour and national capital no longer serve the nation and its people” (8)

Who does benefit from them, then ? Felix Rohatyn was the American ambassador to France and the director of Lazare bank. He was also the head of the highly influential and highly secretive French-American Business Council (FABC). He gives us the answer:

“It is time to think about Europe in a new way, no longer as a group of nation-states but as constellation of dynamic cities and regions which will be our clients” (9)

Note that he doesn’t say “partners” but “clients”, meaning people fit only to buy their products…!

Likewise, during the American military operation against Serbia (a country which sought to protect the birthplace of its religious and national identity, Kosovo) the US chief of operations, General Michael Wesley Clark (10), declared in July 1999 on CNN that:

“There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states

“That’s a 19th century idea, and we are preparing the transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multiethnic states.”

Again, notice this very revealing “we”.

These declarations concur with those made by the cosmopolitan financers Paul Walberg and Edmond de Rothschild for whom:

“The barrier which must be breached is the nation” (1) !

Aside from revolutions, we must also examine the way in which wars are used by the Freemasons as means of securing world domination.

There were two “sparks” in twentieth century history which triggered the globalist chain reaction. These events correspond to specific stages in the Masonic blueprint for the world. These events were engineered using the well-known technique of provocation:

The First World War: The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria by the terrorist Prinzip, a Jewish Freemason.

Léon de Poncins (11) notes that :

“Some authors have claimed that the war of 1914 was in fact a Jewish and Masonic war, perhaps triggered by them, or at least used by them, in order to achieve their objective. Indeed, they did benefit greatly from the Versailles Peace Treaty with the collapse of European monarchies, the democratisation of Europe, the break-up of Catholic Austria, the fact that financial power fell into Jewish hands, and the creation of the League of Nations, which had long been called for and heralded by the Jews and the Masonic lodges.”

We ought to touch upon the Sarajevo assassination, as it played a major role in the outbreak of the First World War. A high-ranking Swiss Freemason wrote a letter regarding the heir to the Austrian throne, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand. This letter was published on the 15 September 1912 by the Revue Internationale des Sociétés Secrètes, edited by Bishop Ernest Jouin:

“He is good, it’s a shame he is condemned”

“He will die on the steps to the throne” 

On the 28 June, 1914, the heir to the Austrian throne and his wife were killed in Sarajevo.

The eight assassins were all members of the Serbian Masonic group Narodna Odbrana, similar to the Italian Carbonari.

The minutes of the trial leave us in no doubt that they were Freemasons, as were the instigators. (3).

Regarding the First World War, the F.A. Lebey (12), one of the official bodies of French Freemasonry, claimed at the time that:

“The current campaign is the continuation of that started in 1789”

And at the Masonic conference, held in Lisbon on 13 May 1917, the Portuguese Grand Master, Magalhaes de Lima, proclaimed:

“The allied victory will be the triumph of Masonic principles”

Thus the massacre of 1914-18 merely served to continue the destruction of political structures which obstructed the path to the Universal Republic.

The Second World War: The assassination of the German diplomat, Ernst von Rath, carried out by a Jew, Herschell Grynzspan, on November 1938 in Paris, led to an intensification of the crackdown on Jews by the Germans, who were already infuriated by the declaration of war by the Jewish world, published on the front page of The Daily Express on 24 March 1933:  “Judea declares war on Germany”

Résultat de recherche d'images pour

Swept along by the rage of cosmopolitan pro-war propaganda, England and France were led to declare war against Germany. All European countries were weakened by this war, both victors and vanquished alike. This war opened the path leading to the destruction of colonial empires in Africa and Asia, much in the same way as this had been done for the Spanish and Portuguese Catholic empires in America. This marked a new phase in the globalist conspiracy to weaken European nations.

It is in this way that the globalists use revolutions and world wars in their quest for the Universal Republic.


(l) Entreprise,  18.7.1 970

(2) Ivor Benson, The Zionist Factor. The Noontide Press.

(3) France-Soir, 24.4.79

(4) Globe, N° I, 1988

(5) Quoted in Rivarol, 8.5.91.

(6) Tribune Juive, April, 1996.

(7) Jean Monnet revived the Crémieux decree, following the liberation of Paris. The decree, named after the president of the Alliance israélite universelle, granted French nationality to all Jewish Algerians, and excluded Muslims, sparking the revolt led by Mokrani, who had just fought for France in the war against Prussia in 1870 c.f. Le Nationalisme français, chap. VIII.

(8) Report for 11th Plan, p.274-275,

(9) Wall Street Journal, 7.5.99

(10) Whose surname at birth was in fact “Kanne” : his mother’s second husband gave him the name Clark.

(11) Léon de Poncins, La F.M.’. d’après ses documents secrets. p. 185-86

12) Albert Mousset. L’Attentat de Sarajevo. Court minutes of the trial.

(13) The regionalism of the pro-European new right is objectively the ally of globalism. cf. P. P. d’Assac. Enquête sur la Nouvelle-Droite et ses Compagnons


Translated from French

The original author was Philippe Ploncard d’Assac

Source: La Maçonnerie, pp 181 – 194

http://nationalisme-francais.com/bibliotheque-nationaliste.html

Résultat de recherche d'images pour