The true terrorists are the very same people who claim to fight terrorism
28 July 2016
While the truth and nothing but the truth should interest us, many people are misled by their (legitimate) hatred of savages and are duped by the mainstream media. They focus exclusively on what the (mendacious) media highlights.
11 September 2001, the Merah case, the Charlie Hebdo attacks, the Bataclan shooting on the 13 November, the Nice massacre on 14 July, a priest murdered at Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray on 26 July…
Let’s take these targets one by one: the Twin Towers (symbol of capitalism), an anti-religious satirical magazine (anti-Muslim but, mostly, anti-Christian), a rock concert with satanic overtones, the day of national celebrations to commemorate the French republic and, finally, a priest, a minister of God. All these targets constitute symbols and were by no means chosen at random.
The media version of each terrorist attack is flawed, tainted by lies. The media routinely buries photographic evidence and statements which contradict their theory (for example: this woman who saw an armed man get out of the lorry: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0KCluRZWKs) or they interview a fake hero, such as the man from Nice, Franck, whose statement was entirely false (https://www.facebook.com/panhamza/photos/a.259863080821062.1073741827.258337060973664/691396847667681/?type=3&theater.)
From inside-job to chaos
In each case, not only are we unsure of the identity of the terrorist, but we never move up the chain of command in order to identify the brains behind the attacks. After all, this is really what ought to interest us if we want to eradicate the problem at its source. Who are the sponsors of terrorism? Who has the power and the network necessary to carry out these large-scale attacks without being caught or convicted?
According to Aymeric Chauprade :
“Terrorism is essentially the consequence of state action, the work of intelligence services which use lunatics and fanatics in order to carry out their operations.”
To carry out their dirty work, so to speak. Working on this assumption, it is clear that the French state and its intelligence services (1) would have acted as accessories to the terrorists in these attacks. And it is highly likely that each case was an “inside-job”. We are currently experiencing the French equivalent of the 11th September 2001. The true terrorists are those who claim to fight terrorism. Obeying the orders of a foreign nation, these people are incapable of protecting the French people and are akin to pyromaniac fireman.
From September 11 2001 to this very day – for we are experiencing the continuation of 9/11 (2) – the message conveyed by the mainstream media is clear: “Radical Islam” has declared war against the “Christian” West. The plot is very simple: it has to be, so that the entire population, anesthetised by the cathode ray tube, can understand it.
If we are to believe the various comments in the main-stream media and on the internet, the enemy, the number one danger, is Islam, which seeks to conquer and destroy. It would appear, therefore, that there is no conspiracy. This enemy acts quite openly and defies the Christian West which, incidentally, has largely abandoned the Christian faith. Therefore it is ISIL which, for 18 months now, has been terrorising the French population and claiming responsibility for each of the attacks.
Some simple questions: What is ISIL ? Who are the members of ISIL ? What is their aim? Who controls ISIL? Who stands to gain from these serial killings for which ISIL claims responsibility?
To all these questions we have neither precise answers nor conclusive evidence. And we know just as little about ISIL as we do about recent events. Apparently, the terrorists were all Arab Muslims, followers of Wahhabi ideology. They claim that some were criminals with links to the intelligence services, while others were said to be mentally-disturbed alcoholics or Islamic extremists. Evidently, they were all mere sub-contractors, manipulated and used by the state (3). The very same state which claims to fight terrorism and Islamic extremism, even though for decades it has encouraged the massive inflow of immigrants, most of whom are … Muslims. Spot the mistake.
If the French state really did want to fight against Islamic terrorism, it would tackle the problem differently. It wouldn’t encourage immigration from North Africa and the Islamisation of France. It wouldn’t allow the construction of mosques. Its rhetoric and its spin are contradicted by the facts, so this government has no credibility.
Let’s come back to ISIL. According to the criminologist, Xavier Raufer, ISIL “is not a terrorist group” but “a mercenary army”. Answerable to whom? “There is not a single Islamic extremist among the leaders of ISIL”. According to him, ISIL is a secular group controlled from abroad. And it is the foreign element which we find most interesting. ISIL is, objectively speaking, primarily a weapon of destruction in the hands of the international Judeo-Masonry, working for the construction of Greater Israel. Anybody can see that ISIL, Al-Qaida (“CIA Arab legion”, according to W Tarpley) and the Al-Nusra Front (Al Qaida in Syria) are shadowy and amorphous groups which have never attacked Israel.
This is perhaps just a coincidence … or perhaps not. After all, which state aims to destroy all the other nations in order secure its domination of the world? Which military power seeks to turn the world into battlefield? Motivated by hatred and vengeance, it pursues its messianic mission. Who would look to turn the Christian West against the Islamic world in order to plunge France into chaos, and then do same everywhere else in the world? Once we have examined the world revolutionary movement, that is to say the Talmudic-Masonic conspiracy, asking these questions leads us directly to the answers.
Create a Climate of Fear
Clearly, the objective of this operation, this series of terrorist attacks, is to establish a climate of fear in France. Fear had already set in with the Charlie Hebdo attack. You only have to listen to people in the street talking about how they are scared of going out. This fear, which is building to a crescendo, eerily resembles that of 1793 when the Freemasons Robespierre (his real surname: Rubinstein), Danton, Marat and Duport (the mastermind behind the massacres) were at work. This climate of fear aims to make people accept unpopular government decisions which go against the public interest (reform of employment law). This climate of fear, therefore, seeks to impose a Masonic dictatorship (4). It also aims, above all, to trigger a civil war in France.
This is what the French secret service chief, Patrick Calvar, told us last month:
“We are on the verge of a civil war. I think this conflict (desired by the extreme-right in particular) will take place. A couple more terrorist attacks and it will happen.”
In conclusion, we have every reason to fear a civil war between the Christian and Muslim communities or that foreign mercenaries ransack the country as they did in Syria and Libya (in fact, just about anywhere in the world where the American-European-Zionist axis has imposed “democracy and freedom”.)
Faced with this situation, what should we do? Most importantly, we should not get involved in a conflict from which we have nothing to gain and everything to lose, for the die has been cast. While waiting to discover the truth about these terrorist attacks we must, more than ever, remain level-headed and we should not heed the media siren calls luring us into a civil war. Remain vigilant and, if you are a Christian, find time for prayer.
See also: Does the FBI create terrorists?
(1) According to Roland Dumas, former French foreign affairs minister, the French intelligence services are controlled by Mossad:
(2) According to Kabbalists, the number 911 denotes the eviction of God.
(3) Mind control techniques can be used in this case.
(4) The Masonic dictatorship is the true face of democracy.
Article Translated from French